Something that's in development at the moment...
Its passing audio and making the right kind of sounds, I hope to have it finished sometime soon...
that looks SO cool, and I know I could really use it (as the calf graphic eqs suck up a lot of cpu). Can't wait to use it! (it will be an LV2, right?)
@tbonedude: Thanks - yes I'm running it as an LV2 in Ardour at the moment, there's still quite a bit of work to be done, at the moment it passes audio and dragging on the graph controls does what it should, I'm still doing the automation stuff and I suspect it will be possible to optimise it to use less CPU for the graphics - which is the most intensive part at the moment. So far the specification looks a bit like this:
10 Bands - each band switchable between low pass, high pass, hf shelf, lf shelf and bandpass / notch
Input and Output gain adjustment
Interpolated EQ and gain parameters - smooth changes when dragging the graph.
Nice, but please, give it more contrasted colors on the visual "balls" and curve, on hi res screen, it's hard to get it
@linuxdsp that's exactly what I need. I'm looking forward to it.
Neat, Mike. I look forward to its release.
Ha, that's a chance! Just checked the LinuxDSP page, and there it is released!
Already made a donation, waiting for key and looking forward to testing it out!
Very cool! I have to test it more deeply, but the first impression is very good. Very good sounding, control is pretty intuitive, the drawing very fast!
More contrasted colors would be one thing, like phdemartin said, but then again you learn to handle everything within a minute. Just drag the balls, adjust Q with the scroll wheel, as well as the function (notch, low/high pass etc.) with the mouse scroll wheel at the bottom.
linuxdsp, I really like the eq, but I would like to suggest an improvement to the gui: would it possible to draw how many db the signal is raised or lowered in the upper right (when the gain adjustment is used), where the kHz and bandwidth of each curve are also located?
PS Do you have plans to make a multiband compressor with visible compression curves? I have ALWAYS had trouble even finding one in any native linux format, and the only one I happened upon was the newer calf multiband compressor in SVN. In any case judging by how well all of your other lv2 plugins work and look, I think you could make a better one!
@tbonedude: Thanks for the suggestion, that would certainly be a worthwhile thing to add. I think the way that this is likely to go is that I'll make a note of all the various comments and suggestions and assuming there is nothing 'fundamentally wrong' with the plugin then I will do a free update to it at sometime in the near future and incorporate the changes. This is the first time I've done a UI quite like this so I guess I'm learning too.
As to whether it will be any better than anything else - well, I just make these things the way I like them to be, and whether that's necessarily better or worse than anyone else's plugins is not for me to say. I certainly think there is already some very fine work from some of the other developers - maybe one or two small problems to smooth out but that's true of most of these things and it's the way things evolve.
+1 for the multiband compressor. Linuxdsp plugins are SO good I wish them the brightest future, the fact that they distort like analog gear when overdriven is an amazing plus and just sounds great.
Jamin already has a linux native multiband compressor with frequency response, but of course having one from linuxdsp would make the cpu-hungry Jamin almost useless (except for the fact that it has an all-in-one mastering interface and it's still a great software, sadly a bit outdated).
well, I did use jamin for a while, but it just didn't sound as good to my ear. I'm currently mastering with a template I made for ardour, using GRAPH-EQ2, Calf Multiband Compressor, Barry Satan Maximiser, VC2, and an LADSPA Hard Limiter. Though I hope to soon replace the calf multiband compressor with something from linuxdsp soon (SVN Calf plugins always hog up WAY too much CPU)!
yes I also think linuxdsp plugins sound better than jamin. Does the satan maximizer sound good too?
yes, as long as you don't over do it!
Cool Mike!!! Mono version? I'll ask that of everything, because I like to use mono channels in the mixer and stereo for my busses or auxes. Thanks as always, you know I love your stuff.
Thanks, yes there are plans to do a mono version - a few people have now asked for that and its relatively easy to do. As I said previously, I think the way this will go is that I'll make a note of the various comments and suggestions and do a free update at some time in the near future. That way, assuming there is nothing fundamentally wrong with it at the moment, people can still use it or try it out and then upgrade later once the new features or fixes have been added.
Looks like linuxdsp is not on kvraudio.com, that would be a big and free way to spread the word of how great your plugins are..
@vervelover - yes you're right, but I've always thought of forums / sites such as KVR or Gearslutz etc as not really the places where linux users hang out, they tend to be Windows / Mac. There is a real problem with publicising the fact that this stuff exists (which is why I'm very grateful to Paul for putting a link on this site) and one of the problems is that other than this site I don't think there is a central place where linux users go to get information e.g. about a minority pursuit such as pro-audio.
In my experience it tends to be that people either stick with what came with their distro - And sadly a lot of 'standard' distros still seem to ship Ardour 2.8.2 (and probably JACK 109 !) which means my plugins won't work to full effect.
On this subject, I know there are good reasons why pre-compiled linux binaries of Ardour are not provided on this site, but I know that having to compile it is a major barrier for a lot of people - especially if they are coming from another OS such as Windows. They just don't get the whole thing of trying to track down all the dependencies etc - even though Ardour is one of the more 'friendly' applications to build! For what its worth, I sometimes struggle to put all the pieces of the jigsaw together first time (probably because I normally use a Mandriva distro) - on my last Ubuntu install I just grabbed the pre-built version from dickmacinnis.com - something like that on this site would ease a lot of pain I suspect... But I digress.
The other way to publicise my work would be to include it in another distribution - many thanks to Gmaq for his help in this respect since inclusion in AV linux has helped reached a lot of people. However the inevitable 'downside' of inclusion in any distro is that people have no need to come to my site and are therefore not necessarilly aware of the need to donate - and I can't stress enough how important it is that the site generates some income, since at the moment this is full-time work for me (and on a good month I can just about make a minimal living from it, but if I'm honest, it is a 'subsistence' wage and I'm fortunate that there are a few other people involved in the project who kindly give their time to help with testing etc for free) - There are some opportunities to improve this 'on the horizon' so we'll see how that pans out over this year, but the truth is there is just not much revenue going to anyone in this business at the moment.
Sorry for the long post - but it seemed like a good opportunity to point out some of the difficulties (and practicalities) of making this stuff - programming is often the easy part! :)
This EQ is awesome.
"I've always thought of forums / sites such as KVR or Gearslutz etc as not really the places where linux users hang out, they tend to be Windows / Mac."
KVR has been nicely supportive of Linux, they indicate Linux-related stuff, and there's a fair amount of Linux-related discussion on the forums. I know some members of this board also frequent KVR. I particularly enjoy the fact that few (if any) respondents to my posts at KVR seem to care about the OS I use. They've focused on responding to my questions or listening to and commenting on my music. Perhaps I'm fortunate.
OTOH, I no longer visit the Reaper forums. Too much fanboy-ism there, though to be fair some die-hard Linux advocates are still hanging out there. I got tired of the bullsh*t, even though I think Reaper is a good program. Its devs are good fellows, they do work at the Wine support for Reaper.
IMO Gearslutz is not so amenable, but I don't hang out there regularly.
Btw, there are easier and harder ways to build software these days. The process of determining dependencies is not so harrowing anymore, though of course it's still time-consuming. Compiling still requires some knowledge of development tools, and I agree with you that most Win/Mac users are at a total loss when it comes to building software. Given my experience, I prefer open-source and compiling programs on my own.
Re: Sticking with old distros: Alas, some of the mainstream optimized distros aren't exactly keeping up to date, and there is considerable trepidation on my part when it comes to switching distributions. Fortunately I can afford to keep three machines operational, and one of those boxes is always an experimental platform. I do my production work on a machine running 64 Studio 2.1, with a lot of self-upgraded software not included with the distro, and I'm unwilling to upgrade that box until 64 Studio officially upgrades.
Just my opinions, of course. Thanks for your message, and thank you for your excellent plugins. You are appreciated. :)
Dave, thanks for the info - It was a while ago that I went to KVR so I'll take a more thorough look around, it may be a useful way to publicise some of the great things that are happening regarding linux audio at the moment.
Regarding building applications from source etc. As a software developer, I can figure it out, but I think it is sometimes an obstacle for people who are used to other operating systems - although the quality of the configure and build tools has improved enormously in recent times, there can still be situations where a missing library or dependency sneaks through and cause some quite bizarre compiler messages.
Old distros - I have to maintain several machines (mostly constructed from spare parts) in order to develop the software I produce (at the moment I have a rack with a couple of mini-itx based 'servers' which are used for 64/32bit compilation, an AMD64 based DAW - dual boot 64/32bit - which is used for testing - I like to keep the build environment completely seperate from the 'test' environment so I can be sure that installing new software or hardware on the test machine doesn't break the build setup etc and vice-versa) and I use an 'old' dell laptop for installing new distros (currently Ubuntu) on so I can check for compatibility issues and so I don't really care if its 'broken' most of the time, but generally I keep the build tools up to date and I don't upgrade other things unless they have stopped working. As an example, my desktop machine which I use for basic editing of code, email, internet etc is still running Mandriva 2007.0 with the blacbox WM (and some patches) because it all works. I've also experimented with using virtual machines for some of the tasks but generally find you can only really stress test things properly using real hardware.. And I have to maintain some real hardware for backups too.
Just some of the stuff that's necessary to make these little bits of software :) and also some of the reasons why its not as cheap to make as some people might think - I wish it could be made available for free, but real world economics dictate otherwise unfortunately - but I digress (again)...
Thanks for your support - more plugins will be happening soon...
Your subscriptions & donations are critical help that make it possible for full-time development of Ardour to continue. Your support is critical and much appreciated.
July goal US$4500 (US$54k/yr)
Subscribers 899 US$1825/month
Support Ardour, get free upgrades: pay $1, $4, $10 or $50/month for a year: